Honestly, confusing these 2 fundamental concepts makes me seriously question your entire experiment. No! No you didn't! You ripped the movie once, and then encoded that 26 times, each time using different options, to compare encode-time, size, and attempted to compare the output quality. This table shows the results, sorted by ripping app first." and "I then copied that same frame from all 26 of the ripped versions of the music video." mkv file to both HandBrake and transcode-video, running it through all 26 different conversion options.
Quotes from the article: "I then fed this. When I ripped it to the hard drive using MakeMKV, the final file size was 279MB."īut then the author also calls encoding the extracted video/audio using HandBrake or transcode-video "ripping". Quote from Article "On the Blu-ray, the music video is 2:18 long. It is really confusing and super annoying that the author keeps calls 2 totally different tasks "ripping".įirst, the author calls extracting the video/audio of the movie from the Blu Ray (and circumventing the DRM) "ripping".
0 kommentar(er)
